From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,32a9c4641bed19de X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Preben Randhol Subject: Re: FY Ammo: Study about Security Bugs Date: 1999/11/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 553269343 References: <81k5oi$44k$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no X-Trace: kopp.stud.ntnu.no 943616735 22676 129.241.83.82 (26 Nov 1999 11:45:35 GMT) Organization: ProgramVareVerkstedet NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Nov 1999 11:45:35 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-11-26T11:45:35+00:00 List-Id: gisle@kondor.ii.uib.no (Gisle S�lensminde) writes: | They are on by default, and pragma supress is only supposed to | be used in special cases. If I got it right, compiler swiches to | turn off checks is pedanticly speaking to omit some parts of | the standard (the checks), AFAIK. A "pragma unsupress" would be | like saying 'I know you not follows the rules, but can you just | turn them on in this area at least'. I see. Thanks. -- Preben Randhol "Marriage is when you get to keep [randhol@pvv.org] your girl and don't have to give [http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/] her back to her parents." (Eric, 6)