From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4509214aa8b1885b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Preben Randhol Subject: Re: GNAT Support Costs Date: 2000/01/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 576816901 References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no X-Trace: kopp.stud.ntnu.no 948700065 19745 129.241.83.82 (24 Jan 2000 07:47:45 GMT) Organization: ProgramVareVerkstedet NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Jan 2000 07:47:45 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-24T07:47:45+00:00 List-Id: Robert Kirkbride writes: | I have recently made enquiries about using GNAT for a small project (typically | only 1 programmer) and was staggered to find out the support costs. Really | I was just after buying a product that I knew I would get new releases for | as and when they came out and feel like I'm not just using a product for free. Whatever is wrong with the public version of the GNAT compiler? | Does anyone have any recommendations of cheaper compilers that cater for | small projects? Yes the public version of that compiler. Of course _I_ would also recommend you to release the project under the (L)GPL licence :-) -- Preben Randhol -- [randhol@pvv.org] -- [http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/] "Det eneste trygge stedet i verden er inne i en fortelling." -- Athol Fugard