From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: Software landmines (loops) Date: 1998/09/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 386697031 Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net References: <902934874.2099.0.nnrp-10.c246a717@news.demon.co.uk> <6r1glm$bvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6r9f8h$jtm$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com><6renh8$ga7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <6rf59b$2ud$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com><6rfra4$rul$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35DBDD24.D003404D@calfp.co.uk> <6sbuod$fra$1@hirame.wwa.com><35f51e53.48044143@ <904556531.666222@miso.it.uq.edu.au> <35EAB5B1.1DA1986B@ehpt.com><6sf1dn$n52$1@hirame.wwa.com> <6sfq27$fuo$1@hirame.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 23:32:33 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Robert Martin" writes: > > Finalization did end up in Ada 95, and it is the right solution to > >this particular problem. > > I am not sure of the semantics of 'finalization' in ADA9X, but if it works > like Java's, then it does not solve the problem created by multiple exits > from loops. "Finalization" in Ada95 is equivalent to having a constructor and deconstructor for an object. If a file (or mutex) is controlled - which just means it has a deconstructor - then the file (mutex) will be automatically closed (released) when the subprogram terminates.