From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f849b,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public
X-Google-Thread: 101b33,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid101b33,public
X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 115aec,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid115aec,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java
Date: 1999/01/17
Message-ID: <m3u2xqgzi0.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 433565667
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net>
 <tz5n2.4608$TO5.129375@ptah.visi.com> <369DDDC3.FDE09999@sea.ericsson.se>
 <369e309a.32671759@news.demon.co.uk> <369F0592.94F9DDDA@dresdner-bank.com>
 <77pnr4$ch3$1@newnews.global.net.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 22:53:08 PDT
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java,comp.java.advocacy,comp.realtime,comp.arch.embedded,comp.object,comp.lang.java.programmer
Date: 1999-01-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"John Birch" <johnb@invision.co.uk> writes:

> The reason IMHO is that C++ inherently relies upon dynamic memory
> allocation! It's really as simple as that. If you can show me how to
> calculate the maximum amount of memory required by a given C++ program then
> I'll reconsider, until then I'll continue using C without malloc and free!

When does C++ "inherently rely upon dynamic memory allocation"?