From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30a9bb3017fa58dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,959627a08fbc77c5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: GNAT versions ( was :Ada compiler for PC?) Date: 1999/04/27 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 471544292 References: <7fndu7$im4$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7fud3l$hqi$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g0bdf$3q9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7g3klg$26p$1@rtl.cygnus.com> <7g4oed$ko$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 10:37:52 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1999-04-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar writes: > In article <7g3klg$26p$1@rtl.cygnus.com>, > bothner@cygnus.com (Per Bothner) wrote: > > The reason EGCS was started was because things has > > reached a crisis point. This happened while the official > > Gcc maintainer was working for ACT. > > Since Cygnus likes to correct you when people say that > Cygnus controls EGCS, let's clarify a little here. Richard > Kenner in his role as the maintainer of GCC was working > for New York University, not for ACT! That's an important > distinction, just as important as the fact that EGCS is > not controlled by Cygnus :-) But was I supposed to infer from the comment that because Richard (the GCC maintainer) was working for ACT (really, NYU), that that caused or otherwise contributed to the crisis?