From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages Date: 1998/07/30 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 376281475 Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net References: <6pdhfo$1br$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> <6pi71p$n90$1@platane.wanadoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 02:20:23 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-30T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) writes: > Ah, but I always find myself doing the following: > > package Foobar is new Foo(....); > type Something_Meaningful is new Foobar.Object_Type with null; > -- and possibly > function My_Op(Param: Something_Meaningful) return Integer; > > So both the use clause issue, and the meaningful name issue go away. Ahhh, the voice of reason in a chaotic world! Listen to the DRs guys! They know what they're doing! Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you, ... Matt P.S. Did I say thank you, Bob?