From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8f513ebf6208d431
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: "recursive" accept statement ??
Date: 1998/12/15
Message-ID: <m3soehb2rs.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 422602815
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <1998Dec15.122957@lri.fr> <755sbg$80n$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 11:52:29 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-12-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dennison@telepath.com writes:

> In article <1998Dec15.122957@lri.fr>,
>   fv@lri.fr (Frederic Voisin) wrote:
> > I have trouble understanding the behavior of the following program (or
> > the rationale
> > for allowing its behavior, if correct):
> > -------------------------------------
> > with Ada.text_io ; use Ada.text_io ;
> >
>           Ada.text_io.put(str);         -- works fine
> >           Put(Str);                     -- behave like trace.Put(str) ????
> >
> 
> > If allowed, what is the rationale behind, since such construct is much
> > error-proned
> 
> Some would say that doing a "use" is error prone, and that was the source of
> your problem. :-)

Using use is not the problem.  The problem is not understanding Ada's
scope rules.

I use use all the time.