From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9afe16648c0a7435
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT
Date: 1999/03/15
Message-ID: <m3sob6broj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 455277786
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <7cj6nt$rvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 09:11:35 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Larry <lhazel@mindspring.com> writes:

> There is a type named Class in many packages and in one procedure the
> compiler seems to be confused about which Class is used.  Here is
> abbreviated code for that procedure:

"Class" is a horrible choice for the name of a type.  Why don't you just
name the type "Fire_Mission"?