From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 115aec,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: f43e6,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,gid115aec,gidf43e6,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Sender: malo@0x535ba1b6.boanxx18.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.realtime,comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> From: Mark Lorenzen Date: 05 Mar 2005 17:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: TDC Totalloesninger NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.91.161.182 X-Trace: 1110040001 dtext02.news.tele.dk 183 83.91.161.182:39156 X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8652 comp.lang.c++:44175 comp.realtime:937 comp.software-eng:4468 Date: 2005-03-05T17:26:40+01:00 List-Id: Matthias Kaeppler writes: [snip] Strange... I find that the OO facilities integrate very well in the non-OO part of Ada. Maybe it is because you look at it from an outside perspective. > Ada is also -- compared to e.g. C++ -- extremely limiting in terms of > flexibility (which is a good thing for safety critical environments I > guess). You can do everything in Ada that you can in C and C++. It is more work in Ada to "force" things together than in C++. So Ada is not as forgiving, when you have a bad design to begin with. Regards, - Mark Lorenzen