From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-11 09:14:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!enews.sgi.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news2.rdc2.tx.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Sender: minyard@wf-rch.cirr.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why not References: <3BC30674.BA88AAB6@brighton.ac.uk> <9pvv3t$ves$1@news.huji.ac.il> Reply-To: minyard@acm.org From: minyard@acm.org Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:14:29 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.7.109.109 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news2.rdc2.tx.home.com 1002816869 24.7.109.109 (Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:14:29 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:14:29 PDT Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14284 Date: 2001-10-11T16:14:29+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > In article , Pat Rogers > says... > > > >I propose the Booch Components be that standard. If there is a better suite > >I haven't seen it and I've seen many of them. However, there may very well > >be a better collection of components. Let's discuss them. > > I agree with the need, and the Booch Components are probably the best available > starting point. My first thought was to make this exact same post. However, the > current implementation of Booch has not really been designed with real-time > needs in mind. For instance, many of the "bounded" structures, which one would > naievely assume don't perform dynamic allocations, do in fact perform dynamic > allocations, sometimes even during lookups. Have you looked at my set of components? It's at http://adasl.sf.net. I was pretty careful to not do do heap stuff in my bounded containers, and all the containers have storage-managed versions. I'd be interested to hear what people thought of it; I'm pretty sure that people use it but I haven't gotten much feedback on it. -Corey