From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c7d533acec91ae16
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Question for the folks who designed Ada95
Date: 1999/04/27
Message-ID: <m3lnfe3n2d.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 471265583
References: <7g2qu4$ca4$1@usenet.rational.com> <m3r9p6lxrq.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 17:44:16 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-04-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org> writes:

> "Corey Ashford" <yeroca@rocketmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Why didn't Ada95 make a shift operator a first-class
> > operator on modular types.
> 
> See AARM95 B.1 (9.a)
               ^

Oops!  That should be AARM95 B.2 (9.a)