From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4ee5611d3fbf05b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Enumeration literal visibility and use type
Date: 1998/05/27
Message-ID: <m3iumrs6xd.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 357196844
References: <6kej65$dnh$1@hermes.seas.smu.edu>
 <6kejt5$75u@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com> <6kelnr$ief$1@polo.advicom.net>
 <dewar.896294207@merv>
Organization: Network Intensive
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-05-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:

> Anyone have a better way?
> >>
> 
> Sure! Use a normal use clause on the package. If you like isolate
> the type in its own package, so the scope of the use clause is
> limited to the type.

Yes!  This is the simplest and best technique to use.