From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2cb6c27047140e0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: How to implement a continue statement in Ada?
Date: 1998/09/02
Message-ID: <m3iuj7722q.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 387061900
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <35EA8153.7BFC91E3@physics.purdue.edu>
 <6shvd4$5v9$1@usenet46.supernews.com> <35ECD5FD.5F53@atlas.otago.ac.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 01:03:47 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-09-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dr Richard A. O'Keefe" <ok@atlas.otago.ac.nz> writes:

> What exactly is wrong with
>  - Robert Dewar's suggestion of using 'goto', or
>  - my suggestion of using a nested named block and named exits?

What do you mean by a "named block and named exit"?  Are you suggesting
using an exit to terminate a block?  That wouldn't be legal.