From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9afe16648c0a7435 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT Date: 1999/03/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 455445091 Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net References: <7cj6nt$rvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7cjm4g$avo$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7ck8pk$2co$1@remarQ.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 17:32:32 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: fraser@sinopsis.com writes: > I tried it and didn't like it (and I didn't inhale either). However, > what I've found lately is that the idea of defining exactly one tagged > type in each package seems valuable. It makes packages small, and > maintenance easier. Well, it has so far. We'll see. For some coding ideas, you can search the ACM patterns archive starting in Oct/Nov 98, and continuing to the present. You can subscribe to the patterns list by sending the message (body) subscribe patterns to the ACM mailing-list server. Matt