From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,1d8ab55e71d08f3d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rosalia@nis.lanl.gov Subject: Re: what DOES the GPL really say? Date: 1997/09/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270597073 References: <5u93bu$5cj$1@news.nyu.edu> <5uoso1$cj5$1@news.nyu.edu> <5uqh3g$1to$1@bbj.freenix.fr> Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-09-07T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: card@bbj.freenix.fr (Remy Card) writes: > I don't know anything about compilers, but I like how egcs is > developped and made available to testers on a regular basis. If the egcs > developpers happen to have a version that is stable enough to be available > as a release, I will certainly use it and not use the FSF gcc anymore. Dude, don't be divisive. If you need the egcs features, use them! Nobody will be unhappy about that. > P.S: Remember Emacs/Xemacs? Very different. All egcs modifications will have ownership assigned to the FSF. -- Mark Galassi --- astrophysicist and free software hacker Cygnus Solutions and Los Alamos National Laboratory rosalia@cygnus.com or rosalia@nis.lanl.gov http://nis-www.lanl.gov/~rosalia/