From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,63a41ccea0fc803a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: Naming of Tagged Types and Associated Packages Date: 1998/09/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 388078503 Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net References: <6qfp80$p0u$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <35CD0A8E.21D64380@sprintmail.com> <35CEBAAF.B9B82820@sprintmail.com> <35F0B242.8B789C14@sprintmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 22:42:07 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "John G. Volan" writes: > > I do this sort of thing too: > > > > PDW : Pulse_Descriptor_Word; > > > > SOI : Signal_Of_Interest; > > I thought one assumption in this discussion was that we were trying to find > schemes that would allow us to avoid abbreviations. But if abbreviations > were fair game, then there would never have been an issue: Those happen to be the terms people on our project really use to refer to the entity. "What was the value of the pee dee double-yew?" "What's the ess oh eye?"