From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb16c447b2139225
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Rational APEX Ada95 w/ X11R6
Date: 1999/06/16
Message-ID: <m3hfo8ozc7.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 490317459
References: <929466176.893.35@news.remarQ.com> <7k6cr9$qk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <m3so7spj4t.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> <7k8f6m$mta$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:57:00 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16 Jun 1999 15:17, dennison@telepath.com wrote:

> > No.  All the C calls to X/Motif can be done by a thin C layer, called
> 
> In which case you would instead need bindings to the "thin C layer"...

Yes, but that number is small compared to the number of X calls in a
typical X client.