From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Freeing Pointers to classwide types
Date: 1998/10/09
Date: 1998-10-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3emsix65f.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6v15au$7t0$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
dewarr@my-dejanews.com writes:
> The answer is no, but so what? This is like asking if there is a way to
> define a function without using the function keyword, or whether there is
> a way to have concurrent execution without using the task keyword.
> Unchecked_Deallocation is for use in such contexts, why on earth worry
> about whether you can do unchecked deallocations without using
> Unchecked_Deallocation?
There are techniques for doing memory reclaimation that don't require
the use of Unchecked_Deallocation.
I think the issue is, Should you use UD without also specifying a
storage pool too? I would answer, No. It has been my experience that
using the UD off-the-shelf is a recipe for disaster.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-10-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-09-24 0:00 Freeing Pointers to classwide types joecool
1998-09-25 0:00 ` alan walkington
1998-09-25 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-25 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher
1998-09-25 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1998-09-25 0:00 ` dennison
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-10-12 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1998-10-12 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-09-25 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-25 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-25 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-26 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-26 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-26 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-27 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-27 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-28 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-28 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-09-29 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-28 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-09-29 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-29 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-30 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-10-01 0:00 ` dewar
1998-10-01 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-10-01 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1998-10-01 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-10-01 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-10-01 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-10-02 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-02 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-10-02 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-02 0:00 ` dennison
1998-10-02 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-01 0:00 ` dennison
1998-10-02 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1998-10-09 0:00 ` dennison
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-10-01 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-01 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-10-01 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1998-09-28 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-09-26 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-10-09 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1998-10-10 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-10-11 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1998-10-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-09-25 0:00 bpr5549
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox