From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86ec22e070e319c0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: How do I get this to work?? Date: 1999/01/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 433894193 Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net References: <76s0dp$1v4$1@nntp3.uunet.ca> <76tbvv$ba5$1@nntp3.uunet.ca> <770ifd$qui$1@goblin.uunet.ca> <771bl9$sla$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <77b9cp$5kh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <77q5m8$e4o$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 22:16:50 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: warwicks@telusplanet.net (Chris Warwick) writes: > In article <77q5m8$e4o$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com wrote: > > >The point here is that if you look at any program that > >uses the keyword ALIASED extensively, then this is almost > >always an example or importing C style into Ada (see > >separate thread on importing Pascal into COBOL :-) and is > >something that should be avoided. Almost always such code > >can be written to avoid the use of ALIASED, and the result > >will be improved, better structured code. > > I suppose I could create an active layer (package) on top of the C code and > then bury the pointer within the layer... hmmm... is this what you have in > mind when you talk about re-structuring the code?? No.