From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd27e49d2299ccb4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: Re: Much 16 bit Ada useage?
Date: 1998/10/16
Message-ID: <m3d87s7ebt.fsf@fred.muc.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 401805639
Distribution: world
Sender: andi@fred.muc.de
References: <704rnj$9m@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>
 <F0vFAA.AIy.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <707jka$6mm@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com>
Organization: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
> Last I heard, TLD were supposed to be getting together with ACT to come 
> up with an Ada95 compiler for the MIL-STD-1750 processors build on the 
> GNAT technology. I don't know if that happened or not. Anyone else know?

gcc already has a 1750a backend so it probably won't be that hard.

-Andi