From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,349657f8b72f2411
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Where's Ada95 when OO languages are discussed?
Date: 1999/03/26
Message-ID: <m3d81wzqw4.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 459248194
Sender: matt@mheaney.ni.net
References: <7d8ik6$s6d$1@its.hooked.net> <36F7F02E.BC57F7CB@aasaa.ofe.org>
 <87emmfpw3t.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F837D3.3F7227FA@aasaa.ofe.org>
 <877ls7porm.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F861A0.62887698@aasaa.ofe.org>
 <7d9rc0$ma6@drn.newsguy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:46:12 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kevin@nospam writes:

> Java is more OO than C++ or Ada, yes. 

I don't understand what you mean by "more OO."  Ada95 and C++ both
support user-defined, extensible, polymorphic types that hide their
representation.

What "more" to OO is there?