From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,257bc0ff954a7696 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: ak@muc.de Subject: Re: C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how? Re: Ada 200X Date: 1998/07/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 371315388 Distribution: world Sender: andi@fred.muc.de References: <3.0.32.19980712065953.009dd470@iu.net> <1998Jul13.192027.1@eisner> Organization: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-07-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > In article , dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > > > As for "don't admit programs which have runtime systems". There is nothing > > about Ada that requires that every Ada program needs a runtime system. Indeed, > > GNAT provides a capability, which we call GNORT (GNAT with No RUntime) that > > does what it says. Allows the compilation of programs with absolutely no > > runtime. Obviously this means that there are restrictions in the subset > > that can be used, > > Not so obvious to some of us. Please elaborate. I guess all features related to tasking (protected types, the task type) are gone. Exceptions need moderate run time system support, so maybe they are gone too (?) -Andi