From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe4dfa1b8acdbe4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: Re: gnat310p on NT
Date: 1998/08/15
Message-ID: <m3af579hx6.fsf@fred.muc.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 381288137
Distribution: world
Sender: andi@fred.muc.de
References: <01bdc744$cef04bc0$0e2915c0@w95>
 <0QXRrq2x9GA.123@samson.airnet.net> <dewar.903137045@merv>
Organization: [posted via] Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Muenchen (Germany)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-08-15T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> 
> As I say, the conditions vary. In the case of the Realia COBOL compiler,
> the code generator was a single 35,000 line file. Not because, contrary
> to typical uninformed opinion, COBOL has no nice way of breaking things up
> into multiple files, but because only one person ever worked on this file
> (me) and it took only 20 seconds to compile on a slowish (386 25 MHz) PC
> which was quite acceptable.

You don't want to say with this that the code generator was writen in COBOL?

-Andi