From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ebf0c2e0d9df034 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Preben Randhol Subject: Re: Ada95 + FORTRAN 77 Date: 1999/09/07 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 521997223 References: <7r07rr$gap$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r0u2o$vik$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7r1ec4$aup$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@itea.ntnu.no X-Trace: kopp.stud.ntnu.no 936688808 13296 129.241.83.82 (7 Sep 1999 07:20:08 GMT) Organization: ProgramVareVerkstedet NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Sep 1999 07:20:08 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-09-07T07:20:08+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar writes: | Well I don't think there are any other Ada 95 compilers | currently available for Linux (I see you are a Linux user), yes :-) [thank you for careful information] | attributes: Unrestricted_Access (allowing complete freedom in | use of pointers to functions) Where do I look to learn more about this feature? | Robert Dewar | Ada Core Technologies | | P.S. Since Ada Core Technologies was committed to the open | source model and to Linux long before these became the | subject of everyone's attention, it is not surprising that | GNAT is there on Linux first, but it would certainly be nice | to see some competition there, especially if some other Ada | vendor would take the plunge and open source their technology! I agree, but I will at least thank you for doing so! -- Preben Randhol oO "Don't think about domination, think [randhol@pvv.org] .` ; about freedom, it doesn't dominate." [www.pvv.org/~randhol/] \ G -- RMS, LinuxWorld 1999. `_) n o m e