From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b70281e9df653875 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-17 14:47:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!proxad.net!proxad.net!skynet.be!skynet.be!louie!tlk!not-for-mail Sender: lbrenta@lbrenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: GCC 5.01p (was: Re: gcc/gnat 3.3) References: <3f8fff8b$1_1@news.tm.net.my> From: Ludovic Brenta Date: 17 Oct 2003 23:48:42 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: -= Belgacom Usenet Service =- NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.136.25.207 X-Trace: 1066427270 reader2.news.skynet.be 3648 217.136.25.207:49362 X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@skynet.be Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1107 Date: 2003-10-17T23:48:42+02:00 List-Id: "Jeff C," writes: > Perhaps this weekend when I (hopefully) re-release my properly > marked GNAT 5.01p for Redhat 9 x86 I could also put together some > sort of Solaris (8) package. I am suspicious about this "5.01p" version number. In my understanding, the "p" stands for something like "published" or "public", i.e. it denotes one of ACT's stable releases. Since I am not aware of any 5.01p official release by ACT, I would suggest you use a version number that denotes that this is from CVS, such as e.g. 5.01.cvs.20031017. -- Ludovic Brenta.