From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matthew Heaney Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism Date: 1999/06/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 486081921 References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net> <7i17gj$1u1k@news2.newsguy.com> <7icgkg$k4q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3749E9EC.2842436A@aasaa.ofe.org> <7id2eo$fag@drn.newsguy.com> <3749FF7D.F17CE16A@aasaa.ofe.org> <374AC676.F7AE0772@lmco.com> <7ieuja$5v9@news1.newsguy.com> <7ifd6l$bmf@sjx-ixn1.ix.netcom.com> <7ihf6i$4hv@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 11:21:32 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-06-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen writes: > From a little fooling around with your code above and gnat, and the > Rationale, it looks like the compiler has to examine the code that > attempts to initialize a T'Class variable and allocate the maximum > space for it that that code would require. No. The compiler has no way of knowing at compile-time how much space to allocate on the stack for the return value of the function. The size is determined at run-time. This is how factory methods work: procedure Print (Q : in Queue'Class) is Iter : Iterator'Class := Get_Iter (Q); -- -- Iter goes on the stack (not the heap), and its size is -- determined at run-time. begin