From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: F-22 ADA Programming Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 01:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <220f97ab-9aa2-4961-b140-2b271c3ab99a@googlegroups.com> <99759c3f-a35f-4745-a8fd-2fb6ab6fb1aa@googlegroups.com> <48dc1630-8e7d-4e29-8bdd-53d74932d9d0@googlegroups.com> <88a7f98c-55c2-4b5f-8a9d-c8b7512781c8@googlegroups.com> <50cacb19-5d0b-4dbe-b91b-0b3b462913d6@googlegroups.com> <07d0ad94-160b-4873-ba1b-403e8c0bc420@googlegroups.com> <8100a013-e50d-4a19-b506-716288a2ccb4@googlegroups.com> <1c2c4aa0-9a0d-4906-b77e-79f2c3e27362@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 01:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4ba3e936a920522f57a8dcc8c800be9e"; logging-data="26291"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+UTUaJ5pTfqu/ZM3TuC4NkerW+ch2RBNA=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+3LmysTa2te1rw3ZGj2qUz/dJ3U= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:22983 Date: 2014-11-03T01:36:10+00:00 List-Id: On 2014-11-02, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > >> They value >> running on everything > > Portability seems to be a valid engineering goal. > >> with a battery > > No. This is Python's domain. C and C++ are relatively naked. > In what I think is the OP's case, C is way more portable than Python because it can be used for things that Python will never run on such as small microcontrollers. I think that's what the OP meant with the "battery" reference. However, the OP is out of touch with reality when saying this level of portability is a bad thing. This level of portability is required in the real world and with the right language, and widely supported compilers, we should be able to have wide ranging portability _and_ a safer programming ecosystem. Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world