From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e512734808cc6a49 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Tardieu Subject: Re: [Q] GNAT Success stories? Date: 1997/04/23 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 236782038 Sender: sam@zaphod.enst.fr References: <5jj7p6$bj2@hacgate2.hac.com> To: wdwright@ccgate.hac.com (Dave Wright) Organization: Sam's machine Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >>>>> "Dave" == Dave Wright writes: Dave> Has anyone successfully used gnat on a medium (+60K lines) Dave> project? We're considering using gnat on a Pentium running Dave> Solaris X86. Any comments, suggestions, warnings are Dave> appreciated. Well, GNAT's front-end which is written in Ada is much larger than 60K lines and gets compiled by GNAT itself :-) Moreover, Solaris x86 is a target fully supported by ACT (see Robert Dewar's post a few days ago). I've also seen medium/large military projects (+500K lines) compiled with GNAT running successfully, so the size of your project is not going to be a problem. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@ada.eu.org