From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ecaaa0743f120b8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!not-for-mail Sender: malo@0x535ddcf0.boanxx18.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unwanted newline References: <1118653872.708684.57360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <42ad7848$0$27776$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> From: Mark Lorenzen Date: 17 Jun 2005 22:41:30 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: TDC Totalloesninger NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.93.220.240 X-Trace: 1119040890 dtext01.news.tele.dk 185 83.93.220.240:12083 X-Complaints-To: abuse@post.tele.dk Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11455 Date: 2005-06-17T22:41:30+02:00 List-Id: "Dr. Adrian Wrigley" writes: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:12:57 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > > > Ada's Text_IO is a bit more "sophisticated" than C's stdio. > > I hadn't noticed this effect with the newline! > (Put and Put_Line get the same result) > > Can you give a more detailed explanation? > (I suppose ploughing through the RM might help...) > -- > Adrian A.10.2 (3).