From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Object,Subject,Verb, and Phrase (Sentence) Oriented Programming
Date: 1999/06/18
Date: 1999-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31zf9lv4t.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 376A16EE.EA9A2D07@acm.org
On 18 Jun 1999 11:52, "Fernando D. Mato Mira" <matomira@acm.org> wrote:
> Really, can't Ada dispatching be upgraded w/o losing
> backwards-compatibility?
What are your specific objections to "Ada dispatching"?
And how is dispatching in Ada any different from dispatching in Eiffel
or C++?
> I still have to get my refs. But for what I remember, it seems
> so.. Time for a poll..
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-06-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7k3f2n$3gk$1@news1.Radix.Net>
[not found] ` <37662F29.F4CFB69F@iname.com>
[not found] ` <ymizp21cu2v.fsf@sevak.isi.edu>
1999-06-16 0:00 ` Object,Subject,Verb, and Phrase (Sentence) Oriented Programming Fernando D. Mato Mira
1999-06-16 0:00 ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
[not found] ` <19990617103727.07296.00000475@ng34.aol.com>
1999-06-18 0:00 ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
1999-06-18 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-06-18 0:00 ` Fernando Mato Mira
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox