From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,27544cb48c942326
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.14.169 with SMTP id q9mr28797701pbc.2.1319578088332;
        Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p6ni1512pbn.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Length of unbounded_string.
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:28:01 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2zkgopxr2.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <4ea68441$0$8041$703f8584@textnews.kpn.nl>
	<aacbc91c-4c78-49a0-ae42-511a68485773@c1g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="30619"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cMeYO/XpHfBQ5zH/ZKHdSigKJdNbMvOA="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I4UNax8a4vYQznYlGTYCPSZDjl4=
	sha1:vUvljP+AKIiveOLPe6zFzU+x0lk=
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18705
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2011-10-25T22:28:01+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Vadim Godunko <vgodunko@gmail.com> writes:

> It would be nice to have small and compilable reproducer, as well as
> information about your system and compiler.

I think this is the 4th time you've been asked for this! NB, 'small'
means also 'stand-alone'; just plain Ada, no Gtk etc. Write the
reproducer as a complete working program, make sure it demonstrates the
effect you're seeing, then attach it to a message (paste it into the
message if you must, or put it on Dropbox or pastebin), don't re-type
it. I don't think anyone has ever managed to re-type a program code into
Usenet without a mistake.