From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,751d508677a5add1 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.71.90.67.MISMATCH!news.unit0.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reporting bugs in GNAT Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:22:16 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8f469661-370c-4484-82d8-f1b365455e0f@w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <98aa58b3-50fc-418d-9f72-524b5a23c89d@t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <87hbilt6ua.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org> <877hjd40ca.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew"; logging-data="19567"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SrfQRqRz/3rV8VE83OL2Lw6QSlxIBLJw=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IYXDgScEhYhWRl0rfkXFmp3bcdY= sha1:ljGQaME7CAwnPGPY0XEUWO1gnUE= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13761 Date: 2010-08-26T21:22:16+01:00 List-Id: Florian Weimer writes: > * Simon Wright: > >> Warren writes: >> >>> turning *.ad[sb] into *.ada files etc >> >> At least once in the past (June 2009) I've had success sending a >> reproducer in a ZIP file. >> >> And if you want to report a GPR-related problem you're going to have to >> send the GPR! >> >> Can you remind me where the instruction to cat all the .ad? files so >> they can be gnatchop'd comes from? > > Some wrote it down about eight years ago: > > > > It's still a reasonable requirement. It's really difficult to argue > about compiler bugs when people only post the parts they think are > relevant, or upload stuff with their own build system and expect that > everybody understands that as well as they do. In terms of the info needed, I can only agree! It was more a question of the presentation.