From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr1608768pbc.8.1342081785252; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 01:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni11511pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X? Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:29:44 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5> <4ff312ad$0$6178$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <4ff314d8$0$6218$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <856acffb-1fc3-474e-b11f-f540977e945f@googlegroups.com> <0o59v7djiffnl7sqdpp2uiso78oa9hb8sb@invalid.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="77deb14aadc54f7e5248011e65bf9740"; logging-data="1552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VGL4byi4SM1QMLyPFI+sd/uz0NHtPR/c=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:X15BxqAL3137zZGxCASMTh8c/Zw= sha1:VzfCnkin0fLfQ29Ona+XFMa9cEg= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-07-12T09:29:44+01:00 List-Id: Egil Høvik writes: > There's also the fact that the BLAS/LAPACK libraries used by AdaCore > in previous versions were C code generated from very old Fortran, > where stack variables didn't exist, thus the C code is littered with > static variables, which means a ton of issues with multithreading, and > is a violation of RM A(3) Good point! What's the threading position with current BLAS/LAPACK?