From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,832f7594a9660d69 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsinpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada.Real_Time Vs. Ada.Calendar Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:56:03 +0000 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <1164209051.002619.21380@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1164261362 24778 62.49.19.209 (23 Nov 2006 05:56:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 05:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BzyB/ZYvJFhntBUoyByRhDtiiw0= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7657 Date: 2006-11-23T05:56:03+00:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey R. Carter" writes: > In general, you can't count on them having any meaningful > relationship. Real_Time may be a count of ticks since the program > started, for example, while Calendar must be a date and time CE. And I don't think it would be right to expect the relationship to be constant, either -- Ada.Calendar might be synchronised with an external time shource and might not be monotonic, whereas Real_Time ought to be monotonic.