From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c39ad3e35a7690a9
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr387534pbb.8.1329294962891;
        Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni27232pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Convention for naming of packages
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:36:01 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2vcn81ojy.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <op.v9fjran9ule2fv@douda-yannick>
	<jh1ef7$26qm$1@adenine.netfront.net>
	<4f355230$0$21451$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
	<jh4ev3$h3l$1@munin.nbi.dk> <jh95ba$go0$1@dont-email.me>
	<op.v9k356ipule2fv@douda-yannick> <op.v9nyxn02ule2fv@douda-yannick>
	<op.v9n27emlule2fv@douda-yannick> <jhemsf$lu1$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<m2zkck20wy.fsf@pushface.org> <jhfjds$ne0$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="20263"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193tFByS5vZnr8tPZEDRKxwkGL/sXEK/ps="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fdVwFThEoaRt6NrQ66mZamcGLdo=
	sha1:bY6NswWF2GI+l3iH5gjeg7AAJq8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-02-15T08:36:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr> writes:

> Le 15/02/2012 05:09, Simon Wright a écrit :
>> I've adopted AdaCore's convention to use J instead of the (potentially
>> confusing) I in
>> 
>>    for J in Foo'Range loop
>
> Recently, I adopted the convention to use the first letter of the array
> (rather than the systematic I):
>
> for T in Tab'range...
> for A in Arr'range...

I see your and Niklas's point, but it seems less strong in

   for J in 0 .. DOM.Core.Nodes.Length (Nodes) - 1 loop

(I already have an N in scope; I think I cut it a bit fine there, N's
scope is 110 lines in the particular instance)