From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,d275ad890e7b3ecc
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.95.2 with SMTP id dg2mr71753wib.2.1348190012170;
        Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ed8ni3498083wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: problem with Real_Matrix*Real_Matrix
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:23:57 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2vcfb3zjm.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <cf82061e-ebae-46fc-b8d3-26c6dc9f84d9@googlegroups.com>
	<4829eef7-891e-434e-8795-a75a5b38aa7f@googlegroups.com>
	<b7da7eb6-7551-4ff6-8cc0-a67bb25b6396@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="a9272c9c584810f74e3f95ce46cbeceb";
	logging-data="15537"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19CiO4628zo5eopXb4zGFAKNrS4BGVp2nE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/129wTLZXPQCkq2fXI6zBs54fZM=
	sha1:7cXJ3yCgNeovxV1VSNoQ01s5J4g=
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: 2012-09-18T20:23:57+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Anatoly Chernyshev <achernyshev@gmail.com> writes:

> yet if there's one bug, there must be another.

Not sure that strictly follows! It does lead one to wonder about the
unit tests that either don't exist or were wrongly "fixed" to match the
changed behaviour.

> For the time being I would suggest to switch to something tested by
> time, like lapack.

In this case, that would be BLAS! (*gemv).

You can get this by using GCC 4.6 or 4.5, or GNAT GPL 2011.