From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c7b0b777188b7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.jgaa.com!news.hacking.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: Jacob Sparre Andersen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL Edition Maintenance and Upgrades Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:15:29 +0100 Organization: Jacob's private Usenet server Message-ID: References: <1128499462.850353.146890@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87ek6zom2h.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87ek697ga5.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> <435e99ee$0$23939$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1130321538.366226.26460@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <4360b346$0$22526$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1130478101.700035.316750@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <4367a7f9$0$21951$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp236.dhcp.nbi.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: jacob-sparre.dk 1130948129 8696 172.24.5.236 (2 Nov 2005 16:15:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: sparre@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:15:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7hUN3XAwzninWYwYSijbnD5AY/c= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6127 Date: 2005-11-02T17:15:29+01:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: >> My current work will be distributed under an Open Source license, >> but I would like to have the freedom to advice costumers to select >> Ada even for closed source products. > > Do you mean you'd like to advise your customers to select the free > GMGPL GNAT (as opposed to Ada) for closed source products? Technically, no, but in some practical cases, yes. The specific choice of the Ada compiler doesn't matter that much to me. What matters is if it works for the target platforms at an acceptable cost for the specific project. For my only previous shrink-wrap project, I am pretty sure we used Aonix for compiling the delivered version. The project budget wasn't large enough to pay for GNAT/pro, and we only had to deliver a Microsoft version of the application. Greetings, Jacob -- xsnow | xshovel > /dev/null