From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b4945ea154eefb5f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr14414038pbb.2.1334690946596;
        Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni67652pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Building gnat-gpl-2011-avr-windows from scratch in GPS
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:29:05 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2ty0ijgxq.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <20256137.216.1333941508115.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpp14>
	<m24nstgyhw.fsf@pushface.org>
	<11114179.137.1334181998473.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynej18>
	<20a04e0a-04b9-4bc9-bb94-04ba35e451d0@f27g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<jmk7gb$9i0$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="5670"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MZ+bmVZNlmkniWj1BQfoRPTBxfBq+pyw="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:L3xmkANerb8+seTKR/km3tL/ews=
	sha1:4sELDfePHFUCnR/Fz3h+Mx85W48=
X-Received-Bytes: 1713
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-04-17T20:29:05+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk> writes:

> I have also added a switch and modified the example along the lines : 
>     Sw : Boolean renames MCU.PinB_Bits(1);
> ...
>     MCU.DDRB_Bits := (1 => DD_Input, others => DD_Output); 
> ...
>         LED <= not Sw;
> and the fact that it works as expected suggests to me that the GCC4.5 bug 
> with renamed registers has been fixed.

Is that http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 ? If so, it's
certainly fixed in 4.7.0 and should be in 4.5, 4.6 too (releases after
21 January 2012; SVN revisions 18336[567]).