From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6487f59679c615d8 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.237.71 with SMTP id va7mr1220494pbc.6.1336643021619; Thu, 10 May 2012 02:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Path: pr3ni9451pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!texta.sil.at!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Reference Manual 2012 in info format Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:43:40 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <82aa1ud0l3.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <20120509131736.63c924c8@vostro> <17qiwxc1yxhx7$.11tflala8jabh$.dlg@40tude.net> <4faa7790$0$9508$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <1qod0a82z1gx4.6ncrd98m7cz3.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="GhzCuPrEZ+dInccd0W7aSw"; logging-data="15307"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19u9T0DtWnrv9dr4P2PWP8x361P11caJoA=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eWk3960CdEOgK2zPAhKw4phNwkM= sha1:DXyBBgLtWRB02ILCfF6Nvv+jJXo= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: 2012-05-10T10:43:40+01:00 List-Id: "Nasser M. Abbasi" writes: > Why not use Latex? Then you get the full 30 years of latex > scientific publication tools that Latex has, with all the > indexing, table of contents, bibliography, page numbers, > cross referneces, tables, figure, graphics, etc.. and > zillions of latex packages that comes with it for free. > > Then use Latex2html to convert everything to HTML. Use > pdflatex to generate PDF, generate .ps etc... all from > the SAME plain text source files. see > > http://www.tug.org/texlive/ > http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/help/faqs/latex/conversions > > I do not know why any one will choose a different tool > to publish anything. It is all there ;) For me, at any rate, latex2html produces incomplete and nasty-looking output. I agree about pdflatex, though (especially with hyperref).