From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4cf4f9553f3958b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ronald Cole <ronald@devo.ridgecrest.ca.us>
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.10p under Linux
Date: 1997/09/27
Message-ID: <m2souq2xec.fsf@devo.ridgecrest.ca.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 276093755
References: <34219225.8A7798C2@linkabit.titan.com> <dewar.874726199@merv>
Organization: RidgeNet - SLIP/PPP Internet, Ridgecrest, CA. (760) 371-3501
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> Marc said
> 
> <<Zowee! My binary just balooned from 36K to 181K after a mere compiler
> update! What the heck is up with that?
> 
> standard options:
>     gnatmake -O project -largs -s
                          ^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Baffled,>>
> 
> Probably this is library debug information. Note that this in no way
> affects the size of your program in memory. if the 0.7 cents worth
> of disk space for the debugging information is a big concern, then
> you can strip the executable.
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It's nice to see the blind leading the blind...  ;)

-- 
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA  93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald@ridgecrest.ca.us>    Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO                             Fax: (760) 499-9152
My PGP fingerprint: E9 A8 E3 68 61 88 EF 43  56 2B CE 3E E9 8F 3F 2B