From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9da214e92ce675ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!peer1.news.newnet.co.uk!194.159.246.34.MISMATCH!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaCL vs GNAT2007: "Deep_Tag_Finalize" not declared in "Finalization_Implementation" error Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:45:38 +0000 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <47568e1f$0$8055$bf4948fe@news.tele2.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1197053137 21802 62.49.19.209 (7 Dec 2007 18:45:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 18:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gmG9eJ4gKCQN7qzAhyApVHikWps= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (darwin) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18766 Date: 2007-12-07T18:45:38+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > Since "Finalization_Implementation" is _not_ a standard Ada package, > but is a compiler-specific package, the best solution is for ADACL > to stop using it. > > Why does ADACL need it? I suppose because hooking in to garbage collection is pretty compiler-specific?