From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,41e2008f41502f03 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!peer-uk.news.demon.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should a GUI be separated from the application? Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:56:57 +0100 Organization: Pushface Message-ID: References: <1159290971.834857.212700@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <451BFDBA.7080907@obry.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: pogner.demon.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1159505818 25772 62.49.19.209 (29 Sep 2006 04:56:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tbDORt3H2I+YQJK5qm9xn+1ED2I= User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6803 Date: 2006-09-29T05:56:57+01:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry writes: >> It does mean programming your GUI in HTML/JavaScript which I can agree >> is less than pleasant, but I'm not at all sure that GUI programming in > > No. You can use Ajax-XML based control of the GUI. See the AWS's Ajax > Web Elements demos. The application only output XML actions. No HTML or > Javascript messing, the framework is already done by AWS. I suppose that the _necessary_ JS is created by AWS, then. Doesn't that make it hard to use a 'standard' web designer to create the pages and just add a little interaction here & there? >> Ada is any less tedious ... and it certainly makes you think about >> separation of concerns! >> >> I have yet to get to grips with XML-formatted (ie, structured) >> responses. Perhaps I'm reading the wrong book (Professional Ajax from >> Wrox). > > Or you haven't looked at AWS recently :) You might have a point there :-) On the other hand I'm not sure I should, copyright/GMGPL issues ...