From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,76e8d825615718a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers Hash function for a set of small integers
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:08:02 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2r5m090j1.fsf@pushface.org>
References: 
 <50701baa-7c05-450c-a42d-c699516ddc00@t14g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
	<m28w8dyhjr.fsf@pushface.org>
	<0590cf17-12ea-401d-9dc3-02365139b37e@p35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<m2wrvxw0mg.fsf@pushface.org> <wcchbmy6ox7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
	<m2zl0p9b7i.fsf@pushface.org>
	<06f5335a-f686-4af1-893a-55517abe8d1a@s21g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:08:03 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="KCXegvZb5vh43D+f3BR6Ew";
	logging-data="5155"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/i5p/B3BJJVxxYmmAzrXbDEKa+aoi51A8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:s7kxU8qKss6OETCdJ1rnTH4vLVQ=
	sha1:FlVYzDZwrivL2YxEHcBa8FAYzJI=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10243
Date: 2010-04-27T20:08:02+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com> writes:

> In any case, unless you're trying to develop code that compiles with
> an Ada95 compiler, I'd prefer to use 'Mod over Unchecked_Conversion.
> The whole purpose of 'Mod was to eliminate the need for
> Unchecked_Conversion in cases like this, since it was impossible to
> write "normal" code that would do the computation correctly.

Ada95 it is .. though I could actually change now with no impact on the
current user project, which is not going to migrate.