From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial project? Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:43:23 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ"; logging-data="9794"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/sPAK/xPfYF3AoOow2oRQU9FKn5fj8XZs=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4Y1B32aj8ZI/x/L4Va6P2hbsZ7A= sha1:Ds/QKqGlI6a5qg/vffS+KwmbSkY= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18981 Date: 2011-03-09T20:43:23+00:00 List-Id: Maciej Sobczak writes: > 3. Availability of reasonably robust and up to date compilers. > Unfortunately things are very bad for Ada in this regard - compilers > are either bug-ridden or outdated. Speaking only of GCC, is this actually any different for Ada vs C or C++? (and the outdated ones have their own bugs ...)