From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: String_Holder ?
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:23:26 +0000
Date: 2011-12-22T12:23:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2r4zw7q2p.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9lgdtoFi8U1@mid.individual.net
Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:
> I assumed that you are coding this yourself, and that you would use,
> and perhaps rename, only those operations of Unbounded_String that are
> appropriate for the derived type, and avoid others. But removing the
> other operations is more thorough and stricter.
Couldn't the derivation be private? (Unbounded_String is only privately
controlled, which has caused problems with GNAT in the past, but I think
those times are behind us).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-18 12:34 String_Holder ? Natasha Kerensikova
2011-12-18 16:48 ` Brad Moore
2011-12-18 20:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-12-18 23:08 ` Natasha Kerensikova
2011-12-19 12:14 ` Niklas Holsti
2011-12-19 11:12 ` Martin
2011-12-19 23:53 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-12-22 9:08 ` Natasha Kerensikova
2011-12-22 10:08 ` Niklas Holsti
2011-12-22 12:23 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2011-12-23 1:26 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-12-23 6:18 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-12-22 11:40 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox