From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,23ffa52608fbb144
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.154.133 with SMTP id o5mr1866567bkw.0.1337448907602;
        Sat, 19 May 2012 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 e27ni18120bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem with Delay Alternative in Finalization
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:33:53 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2r4ug848u.fsf@nidhoggr.home>
References: <6v0er7d545kvs3pr7aqe1dnrlq4mg5ldhg@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="/2vSN2OC8n1tCnnuO0LpEA";
	logging-data="18694"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Pa2IQkOQ/isqnMwUGkzNVdosR9ITsv3w="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lGcRIjuU99PKOffd121pq6dEarE=
	sha1:oSEpwFSch95fAO8P3E9LtTTYhhs=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-05-19T18:33:53+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Tim McGuire <mcguire_tm2@yahoo.com> writes:

> I am running in to a problem where a delay alternive used when in
> finalization doesn't seem to be working properly.
> The delay part never seems to happen.

I ran this (after correcting a couple of minor compilation problems) on
a Mac. Using both GNAT GPL 2011 and GCC 4.7.0, the appearance on-screen
is as though the timeout didn't occur:

   $ ./token_test 
   Got Token
   Token timed out!

With both compilers, the debugger shows that the Lock_Timeout_Exception
did in fact happen. What happens next is confused .. Dmitry is probably
right.