From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5dacec64c8c879fa
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.73.229 with SMTP id o5mr643315pbv.7.1328772483893;
        Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:28:03 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni4053pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed1.swip.net!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Preventing Unchecked_Deallocation?
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:28:03 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2pqdo4gak.fsf@pushface.org>
References: 
 <33a35da4-6c3e-4ab4-b58f-a9d73565d79a@t30g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
	<ad427e2f-efdb-4e34-b4cf-ee55a3f8e9f5@f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
	<f4c34323-d0d8-4315-aaaa-31c0119e2ba4@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
	<4350713b-6ac3-4b22-b221-8da2bac52fea@t5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
	<26e4f2a4-edae-4e37-8697-f2390e636a21@z31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
	<07915db7-0e84-4eb5-af69-ee31e10b018f@db5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
	<ad11f6f6-f997-4d1d-a7cc-b7d3e333fdf9@f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
	<wcczkcu2uxh.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <m262fi5llt.fsf@pushface.org>
	<wccipjiqm2v.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <m21uq567h7.fsf@pushface.org>
	<jgvala$vpi$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="28640"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19o4qv1MsgmTTi6egyihffQ8wwanUYZxQA="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MYaxPqtrF/Le9y6/bzgsPBYOUQg=
	sha1:L2xAuP2PLKDc+wmP8UqzWxQRia0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-02-09T07:28:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:

> "Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message 
> news:m21uq567h7.fsf@pushface.org...
>> Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> writes:
> ...
>> Using limited types is one way of approaching this, but I suppose
>> another would be apply conventions, such as insisting on 'in out' usage
>> everywhere??? How do compiler writers deal with symbol tables?
[...]
> OTOH, you'd probably not like the structure much. We didn't hide any
> significant part of the symboltable, because it didn't seem to pay --
> there are hundreds of different values stored there, and pretty much
> any operation could use any of them. We did use some accessors, but
> that was solely for memory management reasons.

Sounds like a good scheme to me; 'private' isn't a bad default position,
but common sense needs to rule!