From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c733905936c6b6b0
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.202.168 with SMTP id kj8mr14403202pbc.1.1334691218450;
        Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni67662pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [OT] interesting reason why a language is considered good
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:33:36 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <m2pqb6jgq7.fsf@pushface.org>
References: <jme7r1$eo7$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<8603135.951.1334573001928.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbdy9>
	<4f8c06f5$0$7617$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	<14veb9cpamoda.ck9fbsd5m9m$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<4f8c3431$0$7627$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	<szik5e8e6n4m$.dgyqh41b6k6b$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<4f8c52b2$0$7627$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
	<9s7d2eufbh6f$.1ivcyxfztaq42$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<4f8c93a0$0$6638$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
	<jmiotp$3gc$1@munin.nbi.dk> <m27gxel5q0.fsf@pushface.org>
	<146segtlt6uuq$.uhujfbcu0yuf.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ";
	logging-data="5670"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ArAyYPKC9BqNfuxuRTL1Vs8e+e4y+49Q="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YK06syK4GbDtC4jSTnsskF0RC8I=
	sha1:3dj6FgmKunXoP5pqcfdWM8InNEY=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-04-17T20:33:36+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> P.S. I would never use an abstraction with side-effects. I.e. Serve would
> become an operation of some explicit Connection, Worker etc object keeping
> the state.

Since this web server was meant to be minimal and to run in small
embedded systems, there was only one server, servicing a single port, so
it wasn't all that abstract. I think I might revisit that now, in which
case this would have been a Create operation, returning a web server.