From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f65d0,bd4d2fccdf730b16,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ronald Cole Subject: Re: gnat-3.10 Date: 1997/06/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 251866479 Sender: ronald@devo.ridgenet.net References: Organization: RidgeNet - SLIP/PPP Internet, Ridgecrest, CA. (760) 371-3501 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.gcc Date: 1997-06-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > We have a number of large customers on HPUX. They were using 3.09 when it > was the current release, most of them have by now switched to 3.10 which is > the current product release. As usual, this will be released publicly in > the future. GNAT is based on GCC, right? What section of the GPL are you relying on to justify making binary releases of modified GPL software to your paying clients and refusing to make the source code available to the public at the same time? Under Section 3 of the GPL, it seems clear that once you distribute an object code work based on a GPL'd program, you must release the source code concurrently. And why hasn't the text of the GPL been included in your previous source distributions? -- Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412 Ronald Cole Phone: (760) 499-9142 President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152 My PGP fingerprint: E9 A8 E3 68 61 88 EF 43 56 2B CE 3E E9 8F 3F 2B