From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e49db73f947323a6 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Wright Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT for a PPC Mac OS X machine Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:30:34 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dFCm8HWntFqmDIilBLqEJQ"; logging-data="5407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+BIF8EexNSr5k3raot9aZp3Iwgas99pqA=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:59Q9Oe/yIktmPZJh2dbRFhUHOg8= sha1:CqgiaXeK9hU/s1jJg9WuCPjk/qg= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19825 Date: 2011-04-18T10:30:34+01:00 List-Id: Bill Findlay writes: > On 17/04/2011 15:43, in article m2vcydos58.fsf@pushface.org, "Simon Wright" > wrote: > >> Bill Findlay writes: >> >>> I've an enthusiastic would-be user of my KDF9 emulator who has a G5 Mac. >>> >>> What is the most up-to-date compiler he can use, and where can he get it? >>> >>> (It needs to be a binary - he would not be up to rolling his own, and >>> neither am I 8-). >> >> There's GNAT GPL 2009 at >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuada/files/GNAT_GPL%20Mac%20OS%20X/2009-tig >> er-ppc/ - do you think that would do? > > He's got that and now we have: > >> gcc -c -I./ -I../Source -funwind-tables -g -gnatoVa -gnatfl05 -O1 -I- ee9.adb >> dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libintl.8.dylib >> Referenced from: /usr/local/gnat-2009//bin/gcc >> Reason: image not found > > Any guesses as to what is going on here? Looks as though the contributor didn't include this library in the tarball. Not sure why it's looking at /usr/local/lib, implies it was on his system .. afraid I don't know who the contributor was, anyone else remember?